Photograph by metropolis of Austin: 1411 Ethridge Ave.
Tuesday, November 30, 2021 by Kali Bramble
The Historic Landmark Fee is taking a current strategy to resisting demolition, opting to indefinitely postpone a quantity of situations at its Nov. 15 meeting.
After consulting with The metropolis’s authorized dehalfment, staffers useful using The mannequin new system in situations wright here candidates oppose historic zoning however are prepared To barter options to demolition. Feeers elected To make the most of this strategy For two historic houses, one at 1601 Cedar Ave. and The completely different at 1411 Ethridge Ave.
“Indefinite postponement Isn’t a system We now have been using, Neverthemuch less it’s one We now have found of and Shall be making extra use of going forward,” Historic Preservation Officer Elizabeth Brummett said.
Applicant Garrett Hill, who appeared earlier than the commission final month, has met vital resistance from The encircling neighborhood and metropolis staff over his efforts to tear down his circa-1915 house on Cedar Avenue. Noting its grandiose transitional type and ties to the working-class Blocker household, who maintained The house for a lot of the Twentieth century, the commission unanimously voted to provoke historic zoning.
Looking for To cease historic landmark designation, Hill has retracted his software for demolition to pursue much less controversial transforming decisions. With no imminent movement on the horizon, staff felt that indefinite postponement was an relevant response.
“What This will do Is simply permit the clock to Outing after 180 days,” Brummett defined. “So if ancompletely different demolition request or halfial demolition request have been To return forward, staff would see that And convey it again to the commission to rethink initiating historic zoning.”
The new system acquired here in useful as quickly as extra to resolve the case of 1411 Ethridge Ave. Rebecca Burrisk, Definitely one of many house’s house owners, appeared earlier than the commission To elucidate that the contract instigating the pending software for tearing down the 1939 house had fallen by way of.
“The property is in pretty dangerous situation, And that i personally assume it’s ready for demolition, however I don’t know what the contract we enter on the property Might want to do,” Burrisk said.
Wright hereas staffers had earlier thanhand useful initiating historic zoning, the uncertainty surrounding demolition made the case An best candidate for indefinite postponement. If, in 180 days, the house owners Do not return to the commission with an up So far request, the case will Outing and Would require resubmission for future movement.
Inside the meantime, Feeer Witt Featherston suggested that the Historic Preservation Office be cautious of the case Getting into the territory of neglect.
“It Might be good to have a recurrenter from staff on what are the repercussions …….